How to Call the Adhaan | Clip | Abu Mussab Wajdi Akkari

7,219 views·Jun 10, 2022

🙀 Most adhaans that we hear nowadays are not according to the Sunnah. YUP! Read the fataawa below: كلام الشيخ على المؤذنين . وذكره لحديث أبي محذورة . حفظ https://www.alathar.net/home/esound/index.php?op=codevi&coid=1527 Modulation and elongation of vowels in the Adhaan It is not permissible to sing the adhaan, but this is not like the prohibition of singing itself; it varies between being makrooh or being haraam, unless the meaning is altered, in which case it becomes haraam. Zayn al-Deen al-‘Iraaqi said: It is mustahabb to elongate the vowels slightly in the adhaan, but it is makrooh to elongate them too much in the manner of singing, because it was narrated that a man said to Ibn ‘Umar, “I love you for the sake of Allaah,” and he replied, “I hate you for the sake of Allaah, for you overstep the mark in your adhaan.” Hammaad said, he meant singing. Ibn Farhoon said: singing in en emotional tone means making short vowels long and long vowels short. ‘Abd-Allaah ibn ‘Umar heard a man doing this in his adhaan, and he said, “If ‘Umar were alive, he would break your jaw!” Ibn Maaji said, Singing the adhaan in an emotional tone is makrooh, because it goes against humility and dignity, and takes the pattern of singing. The degree to which it is makrooh depends on the type, if it does not reach the level of promiscuous singing; if it does reach that level, then it is haraam. Ibn Habeeb made a connection between a sad tone and a joyful tone, as narrated by Abu Muhammad. From this it may be understood that it is mustahabb for the muezzin to have a pleasant and loud voice, and for his voice to resonate. It is makrooh for him to have a harsh and unpleasant voice, and to give the adhaan a joyful or a sad tone; if that reaches extreme levels, then it is haraam. (Mawaahib al-Jaleel by Hattaab, 1/437, 438) Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: The mulahhan or the one who introduces modulation into the adhaan is the one who gives the adhaan in the manner of singing, as if he is singing the words of a song. His adhaan is valid but it is makrooh. The malhoon is the one who makes grammatical mistakes, i.e., he goes against the rules of the Arabic language. But this falls into two categories, those which invalidate the adhaan, which are those which alter the meaning, and those with which the adhaan is still valid, but it is makrooh, which do not alter the meaning. So if the muezzin says “Allaahu akbaar”, the adhaan is not valid, because he is changing the meaning. Akbaar is the plural of kabar, just as asbaab is the plural of sabab. Kabar is a kind of drum (Al-Sharh al-Mumti’, 2/62, 63) Clip from Q&A: #3 Tafseer As-Sa'di: Soorah An-Naml | Aayahs 17-24 | Abu Musssab Wajdi Akkari https://youtu.be/_0p4LGKI2vw #share #subscribe #like ________________ 👍 Follow us on: 🌍 https://www.onewaytoparadise.net 🔗 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AbuMussabWajdiAkkari 🔗 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/OneWayToParadise 📱 Telegram: https://t.me/onewaytoparadise