Is Calling Upon the Prophet Major Shirk? | Shaykh Salih al Fawzan

2,270 views·Jul 7, 2026

📌 In this important fatwa, Shaykh Salih al-Fawzan refutes the claim of the Murji'ah that the excuse of ignorance affects the outward ruling upon those who openly commit major shirk. He clarifies that whoever worships other than Allah is outwardly judged a mushrik, while ignorance and other inward matters relate to accountability and punishment, not to the outward names and rulings. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ❌ According to the Murji'ah, the ignorant grave worshipper who worships the sun, the moon, al-Lat, al-Uzza, or the righteous remains a Muslim so long as he pronounces the shahadatayn, even if he is ignorant of their meaning and openly commits major shirk and manifest kufr. ❌ This is false. Ignorance, coercion, mistake, the establishment of the proof, the presence of conditions, and the absence of preventives are not conditions for the outward ruling. They relate to accountability, the application of the hudud, and eternal punishment, not to the outward names and rulings. We are commanded to judge by what is outwardly apparent and are neither obligated nor permitted to speculate about inward excuses in order to suspend the outward ruling. ✅ Whoever outwardly commits major shirk is outwardly judged a mushrik. His inward reality is left to Allah, and legislative punishments are left to the Islamic courts. One of the greatest deceptions of the Murji'ah is making the conditions for legislative punishments and eternal accountability into conditions for the outward rulings of Islam and kufr. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📌 Video Source: 802- حكم الصلاة خلف من يستغيث بالنبي ﷺ - صالح الفوزان https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfNygJQ1w6U ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚠️ The actual legitimate dispute regarding the excuse of ignorance is whether a person is from Ahl al-Fatrah or Ahl al-Nar, not whether he is a Muslim or a mushrik. ✍️ Imam Ishaq ibn ‘Abd al-Rahman Aal al-Shaykh (d. 1319 AH) said: أهل الفترة الذين لم تبلغهم الرسالة والقرآن وماتوا على الجاهلية لا يسمون مسلمين بالإجماع ولا يستغفر لهم وإنما اختلف أهل العلم في تعذيبهم في الآخرة "The people of the Fatrah are those whom the message and the Qur’an did not reach and who died upon ignorance. 👉 (❗) They are NOT labeled as Muslims by CONSENSUS. And no one is to seek forgiveness for them. The scholars ONLY differed on whether they will be punished in the Hereafter." 📚 SOURCE: Hukm Takfir al-Muayyan wa al-Farq Bayna Qiyam al-Hujjah wa Fahm al-Hujjah, Page: 9 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✍ The Permanent Committee for Islamic Research and Fatwas in Saudi Arabia. Fatwah no. 4400: 👉 (❗) "So clarifying the matter and establishing the proof (Iqāmat al-hujjah) is for the purpose of removing any excuse before carrying out the PUNISHMENT upon him, NOT in order for him to be called a kafir only after the clarification. 👉 (❗) Rather, he IS CALLED a kafir based on the outward act he committed. Such as prostrating to other than Allah, vowing as an act of worship to other than Him, or slaughtering an animal, like a sheep, for other than Allah.” 📚 Source: Kitāb Fatāwā al-Lajnah al-Dāʾimah – First Collection, vol. 1, p. 220 https://shamela.ws/book/8381/396#p1 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✅ The methodology of Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jamaah: The outward ruling is based exclusively on statements and actions. ✍️ Al-Hafidh Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani (d. 852H) in Fath al-Bari (12/272), transmitting consensus: وكلهم أجمعوا على أن أحكام الدنيا على الظاهر، والله يتولى السرائر “THEY ALL UNANIMOUSLY AGREED that worldly rulings are based upon what is outwardly apparent, while Allah alone takes charge of what lies within.” End Quote ✍️ Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 728H) said in As-Sarim al-Maslul (2/339): فمن قال أو فعل ما هو كفر, كفر بذلك، وإن لم يقصد أن يكون كافرًا، إذ لا بقصد الكفر أحدّ إلًّا ما شاء الله. “Whoever says or does that which is kufr, then he becomes a kafir by that itself, even if he did not intend to become a disbeliever, for no one intends kufr except whom Allah wills.” End Quote ━━━━━━━━━━━